Please note the
following:-
In the three
examples above, the oil is totally trapped in the shaded area, not like in
the o.e. sump where there is a 5mm (in corners up to 10mm.) gap around the
whole baffle plate for the oil to run up into the crankcase, both aerating
it, but much more importantly, possibly starving the pickup - there goes
your crank/bearings and quite often the camshaft lobes and rockers - very
expensive ! The problem is hot oil is very viscous and even under hard
street driving, runs up the side of the sump and then up the side of the
block a distance. This causes two problems, some oil is flung around by both
the rotating crank and air turbulence off it, wasting some hp ( in fact, up
to 50hp in a race small block chev - Bill Jenkins Book), but more
importantly, there is far less oil around the pickup. Think I'm
exaggerating, 1/3 fill a rectangular dish with water, place it on the
passengers footwell and go for a drive - make sure you have a few towels
under it !!
The more oil in a sump, the harder it
is too contain it's movement from the pickup. We only needed to go 12mm
deeper, 39mm to the left and 37mm to the right for total continual oil
supply, because when the oil moves, the pickup goes with it.
The top of the base plate
is 49.4mm
under the full oil level dip stick mark, so you already have
1.9 litres of oil in the crankcase above the plate, plus the 2.91litres in
our sump. With the piston squirters in the turbo engine, I would have no
qualms with running the oil half way between the low and high dipstick
marks, even for extreme use, unless I was running a high volume pump and
'loose' bearing clearances. This will help decrease aeration from
windage in the crankcase. You have plenty of oil in reserve, trapped in the
sump.
Even though the oil is totally
trapped by the base plate and constantly being depleted by being sucked up
through the pickup, it is also constantly being replenished by the oil
draining down the block sides, although admittedly, not as quick when the
direction change is first instigated,
but this is not an issue as the sump volume easily covers this short time
period.
There is no real point comparing this
sump to your o.e. unit, it is just so much superior, so comparing it to a
dry sump setup, it does not have the total oil control - although mainly
under braking, and it does not have the crankcase vacuum evacuation that a a
dry sump pump provides ( there are more tiny droplets of oil in the
crankcase air - definitely worth a few kw.), so no, it's not as good, BUT,
it weighs much less, is a quarter-sixth the price and does not have the
reliability concern of an exposed belt drive.